Friday, April 7, 2017

The real target of the Syrian strikes

President Trump's decision to strike Syria left much of the world stunned and many of his most ardent supporters disillusioned. There's so much at play that it's not nearly as simple as outrage over images of little children being gassed.

There are two things we have come to know about Donald Trump: 1) His reaction to being wronged tends to lean toward a knee-jerk reaction, and 2) Hardly anything he does isn't carefully calculated.
From a casual view of the past week it appears that Trump saw the images of dead and dying children in Syria, was distraught and outraged over the images, and ordered airstrikes against Bashar al-Assad's airbase. To see it as only that would be missing so much of what's at play.

Before I get to what is at play, it needs to be pointed out that no matter whether Assad was behind the most recent gassing of Syrian rebels, we know definitively that he's a bad man. He has killed tens of thousands of his own people with chemical weapons, conventional weapons, and starvation. Thousands more have been executed in mass hangings. Remember Obama's red line? Assad thumbed his nose at it and attacked his own people with more chemical weapons. Obama did nothing.

Trump's position has been it's none of our affair, but the most recent gassing changed that. It is odd that the day before the attack Trump said Assad should be left alone. At that point, Assad had the support of Russia and Iran and the assurance that we would not interfere in the Syrian civil war. By all accounts, Assad is winning that war against the rebels. And the rebels have now been taken over by jihadists, many of whom were fighting the Americans in Iraq. This is no longer a civil uprising over human rights. It's ISIS and other Muslim extremists who now own the rebel cause.

Why in the world would Assad invite worldwide condemnation by gassing some innocent children? Some say he didn't. There are intelligence reports that say the Obama administration had been running weapons to the Syrian rebels for some time. Those weapons, they say, included chemical weapons. There's evidence suggesting that's what the Benghazi attack in 2012 was all about. If that's true, the Syrian rebels, now controlled by Muslim extremists, are in possession of chemical weapons. After seeing Trump pull back from deposing Assad, it's possible the chemical attack was actually an act of desperation on the part of the rebels to bring to pass exactly what happened: airstrikes against Assad.

I hope and pray that our intelligence information showing Assad was responsible for the attack is accurate. Let's assume that it is. Trump could've waited days, if not weeks, to formulate a response. He didn't. Nor did he act immediately. He waited until the visit by Chinese President Xi to act. I believe this was on purpose.

What was the primary reason for the meeting with Xi? Talks about our trade imbalance, yes, but the main focus was on North Korea. Everyone knows North Korea is a puppet regime of China. The airstrikes against Syrian were a not so subtle message to Xi that this is what happens to tin-horn dictators that hack off the president.

Xi heads back to China with one certainty. Donald Trump doesn't play. It also makes it clear that Trump's no Putin puppet. Every bad actor around the world has to be sleeping less soundly now.

For those who fear escalation, I think this airstrike should actually ease your mind. Trump has demonstrated that he can punish Assad any time he wants to and never set one pair of boots on the ground. We don't want to invade Syria. We don't need to invade Syria. If Assad decides to get out of line again he can expect a night sky filled with Tomahawk missiles. It's a marvelous behavior modifier. 

But make no mistake, those missiles weren't meant for just Assad. They were a message to Kim Jong-un, the ayatollahs in Iran, ISIS, and every other despot around the world. Don't screw with the U.S.A.


Phil Valentine is the host of the award-winning, nationally syndicated talk radio show, 
The Phil Valentine Show.





10 comments:

  1. I do not believe that an airstrike should ease my mind. Trump jumped the gun on the airstrike and this could have bad results. Assad already knew that the US could punish him without putting boots on the ground. Doing this did not prove anything. I think the airstrike is a good decision, but he should have waited and put more thought into it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Islam has been at war with the United States since the Barbary Pirates struck one of our sailing ships in 1814. It has been 203 years. Islam needs to be erradicated.

      Delete
  2. Chemical attack reported to come from aircraft, in which no rebel faction possesses.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Seems a good way of letting the world know the "big dog" is back on the porch.
    We're not backing down and we come in peace.
    Cross us and......

    ReplyDelete
  4. The main message is that BARRY NOBALLS DOESN'T LIVE HERE ANYMORE

    ReplyDelete
  5. The main message is that BARRY NOBALLS DOESN'T LIVE HERE ANYMORE

    ReplyDelete
  6. Phil's got a good take on this. To rephrase a comment above, there were (and are) risks with acting strongly against this level of national misbehavior. All business people know that when the risk is high, the POTENTIAL benefit is also high - nothing ventured, nothing gained. Turning the corner with our foreign policy at this moment in time may well give the other bad guys sufficient pause to deter them from getting brave. US history keeps repeating the cycle - Democrats with bread and circus domestic policy bankrupt the country, destroy the will and equipment of our military. Their foreign policy sets up a need to go to war, and then republicans take charge, move in and fight our way out of the world mess, with rusty outdated weaponry and demoralized troops.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I was in the Army under Reagan. Carter left the military in terrible shape. We supported a M-1 tank battalion and had to be ready to move 24/7/365. I also remember stealing tires from other units to ready our vehicles.
      And by the way. . . .under Reagan we were allowed to shoot first!

      Delete

  7. nice this blog.
    You put really very helpful information. Keep it up. Keep blogging. I’m looking to reading your next post.

    โกเด้นสล็อต

    ReplyDelete