There's much fanfare over Rep. Paul Ryan's budget. Although it's infinitely better than anything the Democrats have put forth it's not good enough.
For starters, it continues to increase spending, though not at the current rate of growth. Right now we're increasing spending at 4.9 percent per year. The Ryan budget increases spending at 3.4 percent. How about increasing spending at zero percent? Better yet, how about decreasing spending?
Oh, but Phil you don't understand. Entitlement spending is the problem. Oh, I do understand but everyone talks about entitlement spending like it's this runaway train that nobody can control. Congress created all of it and they could end all of it if they wanted to. If they can end it surely they can mend it. We're going to have to increase the retirement age for Social Security and Medicare. That's a given. We're also going to have to start rapidly moving toward privatizing those programs if we ever hope to pull out of this yet the Ryan plan calls for "means testing." That's Washington-speak for welfare.
Basically, what means testing means is if I work hard all my life, keep my financial house in order, fund my 401(k) and otherwise prepare for my retirement then I get nothing back for all the Social Security money I paid in. The government deems me too wealthy to participate in the program. For those who save nothing and have nothing to show for their life's labor they get everything they paid in plus mine. That turns Social Security and Medicare into welfare programs. There has to be meaningful Social Security and Medicare reform if we're ever going to get control of spending.
Ryan's plan also asks federal workers to begin making some contributions to their pension plans by the end of the decade. The end of the decade? I literally laughed out loud when I heard that one. Federal workers should be required to make 100 percent of the contributions to the pensions starting today! That's a no-brainer. When the recession hit in 2008 our company cut out the 401(k) match. Although some of the employees got mad, I always looked at the match as a gift. I was thankful I had it for the time I did. (They eventually reinstated it.) Any contribution we as taxpayers make to the federal workers' pensions is a gift. When you're $16 trillion in debt there are no more gifts. End the pension contributions and end them now.
Ryan's budget purportedly balances the budget in ten years. Ten years? We can balance the budget in ten minutes. Don't raise the debt ceiling. And don't tell me we'll default on all our debt. That's like saying you have a house payment and two car payments. You go to the dealership, sign the papers and drive a new car off the lot then drive over to your bank and tell them you need 30 grand for a new car. The loan officer informs you that you have too much debt and he's not going to loan you money for the car. Do you default on the house and the other two cars? Of course, not. You might default on the car you just bought if you can't talk the dealership into taking it back but as long as you have an income stream you don't default on all your debt.
We have an income stream of about $2.5 trillion. If we don't raise the debt ceiling it simply means that we have to live within that $2.5 trillion. Oh, sure, things will have to be cut because we're spending over $3.5 trillion a year but we still have plenty of money coming in and we won't default on all our debt.
The pitiful whining about the recent sequester and its accompanying cuts made most Americans sick to their stomachs. What a bunch of spoiled brats. We've seen furloughs and layoffs in the private sector over the last few years and we had to cope. The problem is we have a government hooked on the crack of taxpayer dollars and, let's face it, there will never be enough money to satisfy its spending jones.
It's time for the House Republicans to stick their foot in the revolving door of debt.
Ryan's buget is a small step forward, but as you have said the rate of growth between Obama's & Ryan's buget is only 1.6%. Why in the hell is everything ten years down the road? It might look good on paper,far as I'm concerned, they\re both full of crap. The waste & fraud alone,in our government should be criminal, & everyone of these politiclans should be held accountable. There is no difference at what these parasites are doing, than if someone goes out & robs banks at gunpoint. JST Bellfontane, Alabama.
ReplyDeleteRep. Mike Crapo had a great point last week. He asked a senate staffer for the Democrats if their budget reduces the deficit in the first year. They claim it reduces the deficit but, as Crapo pointed out, it's down the road. And as he also pointed out, these budgets are so-called 10-year budgets but they're changed each year so the only thing that gets implemented is what's in the first year. The answer to his question as to if the senate Democrat budget reduces the deficit in the first year was 'no.'
ReplyDelete